- From: Serge Egelman <egelman@cs.cmu.edu>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 12:46:00 -0700
- To: "'Johnathan Nightingale'" <johnath@mozilla.com>, "'Stephen Farrell'" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
- Cc: "'Anil Saldhana'" <Anil.Saldhana@redhat.com>, "'Web Security Context Working Group WG'" <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
I would suggest at the bare minimum, the metric should be whether a person has raised and ISSUE or been assigned an ACTION. serge -----Original Message----- From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Johnathan Nightingale Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 7:20 AM To: Stephen Farrell Cc: Anil Saldhana; Web Security Context Working Group WG Subject: Re: ISSUE-188 (props): xit needs an acknowlegements section [wsc-xit] On 21-Mar-08, at 9:00 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > I wrote all the bits with apostrophes in the wrong place ;-) > > Odd way to do the acks. I'd have thought that contributing didn't > require writing a paragraph and that writing a paragraph isn't a > good metric for contribution. Yeah, I dunno if the w3c has clear rules about this kind of thing, but I consider it sort of an over-limiting process too. I don't know, for instance, if Ian F. has literal text in the draft or not, but I'd say he's been an active contributor, worthy of acknowledgement regardless. Cheers, J > > > My suggestion: go back through the list and minutes and decide > between editor/chair/team who to list & deal with it if problems > arise. > > But whatever, > S. > > Anil Saldhana wrote: >> I am adding the acknowledgement section today with the answers on >> this thread. So please reply to this thread if you want your name >> in the acknowledgment section (along with the name of the sections >> that you contributed). I will regularly update the ack section, as >> and when you claim your rights in the ack section. >> Mary Ellen Zurko wrote: >>> Yes, Page Info lives; thanks. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: >>> Johnathan Nightingale <johnath@mozilla.com> >>> To: >>> Web Security Context Working Group WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org> >>> Date: >>> 03/14/2008 12:03 PM >>> Subject: >>> Re: ISSUE-188 (props): xit needs an acknowlegements section [wsc- >>> xit] >>> >>> >>> >>> Assuming that either Page Info or Identity Signal goes in, I think I >>> can lay claim to having specific text in the LC-June document. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Johnathan >>> >>> On 14-Mar-08, at 11:33 AM, Web Security Context Working Group Issue >>> Tracker wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> ISSUE-188 (props): xit needs an acknowlegements section [wsc-xit] >>>> >>>> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/ >>>> >>>> Raised by: Mary Ellen Zurko >>>> On product: wsc-xit >>>> >>>> I suggestion something of this form: >>>> >>>> This note is created from specific text from x, y, and z, as well >>>> as >>>> input and discussions among the active participants of the Web >>>> Security Context Working Group. It has also benefitted from general >>>> public and working group commentary on earlier drafts. >>>> >>>> We should start tracking x, y, and z in this issue. Off the top of >>>> my head, I know that Thomas Roessler, Stephen Farrell, Serge >>>> Egelman, and Mary Ellen Zurko have proposed specific text that is >>>> currently in the LC-June version. At some point I'll troll through >>>> and try to figure out what the full set is, but if you're one, you >>>> can save me work by replying to this issue, specifying the text (or >>>> section, or issue that had the text). > --- Johnathan Nightingale Human Shield johnath@mozilla.com
Received on Monday, 24 March 2008 19:48:50 UTC