- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:43:05 +0100
- To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
My notes (probably still from the face-to-face) include a remark that the additional context information displayed should include an issuer logotype for domain validated certificates, and a subject logotype for augmented assurance certificates. So far, we've been careful to make sure that the "additional SCE" section isn't inconsistent with the identity signal part. I'd therefore propose that we drop some of the squre bracket stuff in the identity signal, and generically say that, if logotypes are displayed, they are selected as follows: Where this specification suggests or mandates the rendering of (either audio or visual) logotypes, the logotype is chosen as follows: * When the logotype information is derived from an augmented assurance certificate, then the subject logotype MUST be rendered, if present. * Otherwise, when the logotype information is derived from a validated certificate, then the issuer logotype MUST be rendered, if present. Note that an augmented assurance certificate that does not include a subject logo will cause the issuer logotype, if present, to be rendered. I have added this language to the "logotype certificates" section of the specification, and dropped links into the identity signal and additional SCE parts of the specification. Note that this does not pre-judge the still open issue about whether logotypes should be part of the identity signal at all. Regards, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 19 March 2008 21:43:39 UTC