- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:46:12 +0100
- To: WSC WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Calling information: Wednesday, 19 March 2008 11:00 am - 12:30 pm Eastern time 8:00 am - 10:30 am Pacific time 16:00 - 17:30 Central European time http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/#meetings http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#D20080305 (Daylight savings time warning in effect: This call is at the usual time for US participants, but one hour earlier for Europeans.) Chair: tlr Regrets: Mez Agenda 1. Administrivia - pick a scribe - attendance - bash agenda - next meeting: 2008-03-26, Mez to chair, time zones will return to normal the week-end after that Warning: The latest editor's draft has seen some reshuffling of major sections, so section numbers in notes and action items will be out of synch. 2. Face-to-face logistics for Oslo; please remember to register http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/logistics-osl.html http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/39814/wscf2fosl/ 3. Minutes from previous meeting Draft: http://www.w3.org/2008/03/05-wsc-minutes.html 4. Action items not otherwise covered in this agenda Proposed to close; I believe this was done in preparation for *last* meeting: [OPEN] ACTION-401: Johnathan Nightingale to Document/Screencap Larry as a lo-fi prototype candidate for the identity signal - due 2008-03-07 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2008Feb/0084.html Directly relevant to wsc-xit [LC-June], and not covered elsewhere in this agenda: [OPEN] ACTION-390: Thomas Roessler to Make it so [clean-up of error messages part of spec] - due 2008-03-21 I believe ACTION-390 to be the only one that's currently blocking an (overdue) heartbeat Working Draft for wsc-xit, and hope to discharge it within the coming week. [OPEN] ACTION-400: Thomas Roessler to Merge text from ACTION-376 (history storage language) - due 2008-03-21 [OPEN] ACTION-402: Anil Saldhana to Put acknoledgements in xit - due 2008-03-14 Proposed to continue ACTION-400 and ACTION-402 without discussion. Unclear how critical: [OPEN] ACTION-345: Maritza Johnson to Begin designing lo-fi user study for Browser Lockdown - due 2008-02-28 Was ACTION-345 intended to be a toy problem to understand how lo-fi user studies work, or is it mostly targeting wsc-xit phase 2? There seems to be some confusion what this action is all about: [OPEN] ACTION-371: Anil Saldhana to Take a stab at ISSUE-124 - due 2008-03-28 http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/124 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2008Mar/0023.html Relevant to further work, not critical path for LC-June, don't expect to dicuss: [OPEN] ACTION-350: Tyler Close to report about browser security model discussions - due 2008-04-01 [OPEN] ACTION-365: Tyler Close to Propose subjAltName text for 7.1 - due 2008-04-05 (Now B.1.) [OPEN] ACTION-366: Tyler Close to Explicitly address the attributes called out here in terms of the matching algorithm, and work offline with stephenf for his clarification on dc= (and anything else) - due 2008-04-05 [OPEN] ACTION-368: Tyler Close to Draft reversibility text for 7.2.4 - due 2008-04-05 (Now B.2.4.) 5. Review restructuring of section 7 Robustness (was: section 8) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2008Mar/0098.html http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#Robustness Collect initial impressions and possible issues. Current material is unpolished. There's probably too little time to have any kind of in-depth review in time for the call. Proposed to close these actions: [OPEN] ACTION-383: Thomas Roessler to Change editor's draft as outlined above [restructure 8.2-8.3] - due 2008-03-21 [OPEN] ACTION-384: Thomas Roessler to Propose lang about currently interacted primary chrome always visible on screen [do jointly with ACTION-383, restructure 8.2-8.4] - due 2008-03-21 6. Review latest petnames proposal http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2008Mar/0097.html Proposed to close this action: [OPEN] ACTION-391: Tyler Close to Extract out petnames content, provide definition independent of section 7 - due 2008-02-22 - Review of content. - Where do we put this? Propose 6.1-ish. 7. Revisit 7.1.4 Do not mix content and security indicators (was: 8.1) http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#site-identifying ISSUE-104 Some information in certificates is not trustworthy http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007Dec/0066.html 8. Review updated language for 8.1 Do not use security indicator images to suggest trustworthiness (was: 9.1) http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#security-indicator-images http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2008Mar/0091.html Apologies for the lateness of this agenda. Regards, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2008 23:46:54 UTC