RE: ACTION-457: Give overview of why logotypes are interesting in security considerations section

Ack, thought we were doing the IETF thing of repeating all the security conformance in the security requirements.

________________________________

From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org on behalf of Mary Ellen Zurko
Sent: Fri 20/06/2008 8:01 AM
To: Thomas Roessler <tlr
Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: ACTION-457: Give overview of why logotypes are interesting in security considerations section



> I'm fine with the text (and with including it), except for this:
> 
> > Subject logotype data MUST NOT be presented to the user without
> > caveat unless it is contained in an Augmented Assurance
> > certificate.

Agreed. That section is not about conformance language.