Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-06-18

> - We do not make the changes that ACTION-466 (on Anil) was supposed
>   to lead to.
> 
>   http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/actions/466

I actually think we did that in the f2f. Though Anil and others might have 
more extensive ideas. But it's not clear to me what they are. 

> 
> - We believe that ACTION-478 (on Joe Steele, about user testing
>   background for the robustness stuff) isn't in the critical path
>   for the specification.
> 
>   http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/actions/478

It's about testing; that's the next phase. 

> 
> (For what it's worth, I'd support each of these.)

As do I.