- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 18:33:11 +0200
- To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Section 7, Robustness, [1] was a section where we got confused about conformance models and testing. Reading through it again, I would suggest that our use of RFC 2119 keywords mostly makes sense: 7.1.1 (shared secrets) is a purely optional feature that might end up as "at risk" in CR (my guess); we'll probably only know what conformance with this one really means when we've seen an example or two. Till then, I suggest we just leave this section alone, and treat 7.1.1 as an optional feature. 7.1.2 (keep chrome visible) mostly suffers from one of our confusing "MAY NOT" clauses; I've changed that one for clarity. 7.2, 7.3, and 7.4 sound like they are mostly fine with respect to an RFC 2119 conformance model. 7.4.1 [2] is about preventing content from controlling chrome too much. Each of the techniques there is, again, a perfectly fine MUST or MUST NOT; I suspect that most of the confusion here comes from these bullet items being denoted as techniques. I've therefore removed the "Techniques" phrase and the bulleting, but left the text in place. 1. http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#Robustness 2. http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#robustness-apis-obscure-security-ui -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 6 June 2008 16:33:47 UTC