- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 07:43:28 -0400
- To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF844868C5.880235C5-ON85257475.003FEF45-85257479.00406792@LocalDomain>
Web Security Context (WSC) Distributed Meeting Agenda Logistics: Wednesday, 02 July 2008 11:00 am - 12:30 pm Eastern time http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/#meetings http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#D20080702 We will not yet be officially rechartered, but our domain leader, Ralph Swick, has said we can and should hold this week's telecon. Agenda 1) Pick a scribe http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/cheatsheet#Scribing http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/scribes 2) Approve minutes from meetings http://www.w3.org/2008/06/25-wsc-minutes.html 3) Weekly completed action items (Usually checkpointed Friday am, US East Coast time) [pending review] ACTION-458: Anil Saldhana to Add a couple of sentences about what the security consideration section means - due 2008-06-20 [pending review] ACTION-462: Anil Saldhana to Correct link words that have a definition (such as Web user agents) in the first occurrence in a subsection - due 2008-06-20 [pending review] ACTION-466: Anil Saldhana to Create an issue for concrete proposals around "can we just make text generic to not refer to desktops or smart phones or hand held devices" - due 2008-06-20 4) Open Action Items http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2008Jun/0101.html 5) Action items closed due to inactivity [pending review] ACTION-478: Joe Steele to Pull together UT background on 7.1.1 robustness recommendation (shared secret) - due 2008-06-18 6) Agenda bashing 7) Conforming Implementations Needed for CR exit. We'll need at least two conforming implementations to test against. We're currently targeting (at least) Opera and Firefox. Continue Firefox 3.0 discussion . Johnthan is leading. We'll resume in security 6.4. http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/Firefox_3.0_Conformance_with_June_LC 8) Next meeting - 09 July 2008 I believe the next thing we should work on is how we will do our conformance testing. I'm unclear how to structure that. Perhaps begin to lay out the test cases. Thoughts?
Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2008 11:44:10 UTC