- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 08:54:56 -0800
- To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
- Cc: W3 Work Group <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
On 2007-12-05 20:25:56 +0000, Stephen Farrell wrote: > - tweaked terminology & loads of editorial changes > - elided terms: > - no interaction cert: since there's no spec. at which to point > - attested cert: couldn't see the need (am open to correction) I'm happy about both of these changes; dropping the no interaction certificates in fact matches a decision that the WG made in the meantime. > I guess this ought be put on an agenda sometime before being put > back into the doc. I've converted it into a shape in which it can be easily copied and pasted into the source document for the main doc. However, in going through tis, it appears that you also killed the notion of a "secure page", i.e., the material about mixed content. Is that intentional or an oversight? (PS: Please **don't** edit the HTML document. If you want to engage in larger spec editing, please talk to your editor first.) -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 4 February 2008 22:29:19 UTC