- From: Serge Egelman <egelman@cs.cmu.edu>
- Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 10:05:59 -0700
- To: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- CC: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Regrets. serge Mary Ellen Zurko wrote: > > Web Security Context (WSC) Distributed Meeting Agenda > > Logistics: > Wednesday, 06 August 2008 > 11:00 am - 12:30 pm Eastern time_ > __http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/#meetings__ > __http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#D20080806_ > <http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#D20071031> > > Agenda > > 1) Pick a scribe _ > __http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/cheatsheet#Scribing__ > __http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/scribes_ > > > 2) Approve minutes from meetings_ > __http://www.w3.org/2008/07/16-wsc-minutes.html_ > <http://www.w3.org/2008/06/11-wsc-minutes.html> > > 3) Open Action Items_ > __http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/actions/open_ > > 4) Agenda bashing > > 5) CR Entry planning - Items At Risk > > Our table (not complete yet) > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/FeaturesAtRisk > > Example for CR Entry from WCAG (see Items at Risk)_ > __http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/CR-WCAG20-20080430/_ > > Discussion on what our options are in general, to lay them out. > Thomas required for this, since some of the restrictions are the low > bars for getting to Recommendation. > > Choose an example and discuss it, with potential decisions for what we > will say about it at CR Entry > I suggest 5.1.4, Logotypes > > > 6) Next meeting - 13 August 2008 > Thomas to lead a discussion around testing > Perhaps more discussion on features at risk (or perhaps at the meeting > after, when the table should be filled out for Opera and FF). > -- /* PhD Candidate Carnegie Mellon University "Whoever said there's no such thing as a free lunch was never a grad student." All views contained in this message, either expressed or implied, are the views of my employer, and not my own. */
Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2008 17:06:50 UTC