- From: <michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 14:14:58 -0500
- To: <dan.schutzer@fstc.org>, <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Maybe the speech-enabled agent should use two different voices - one for metadata (including but not limited to security context) and another for content. -----Original Message----- From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dan Schutzer Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 11:01 AM To: 'Web Security Context Working Group WG' Subject: RE: ISSUE-115: Mixing of security information and content in non-visual environments? [Techniques] I am not expert on how we currently handle non-visual environments, but one could approach this in a similar manner. For example, when a visually-impaired user accesses a page which is audio only; the page could be broken into two pieces. The first piece would be a heading/preface that cannot be modified by the webservice, provides security and other chrome info and is spoken by a distinctive voice that differs from the rest of the spoken web page, the content -----Original Message----- From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 11:48 AM To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org Subject: ISSUE-115: Mixing of security information and content in non-visual environments? [Techniques] ISSUE-115: Mixing of security information and content in non-visual environments? [Techniques] http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/ Raised by: Thomas Roessler On product: Techniques We currently have material concerning the mixing of security information and context in non-visual environments. Is there a useful generalization of the requirement to non-visual UIs? Are there problematic known cases similar to the location bar favicon mix known for, e.g., screen readers?
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2007 19:15:50 UTC