- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:46:28 +0100
- To: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
On 2007-11-27 10:13:02 -0500, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote: > 9) ISSUE-115 - Mixing of security information and content in non-visual > environments? > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/115 > We have no identified next steps on this one I see three relevant action items: * ACTION-327 on Thomas Roessler to Generalize 8.1.2 to be not specific to visual interfaces - due 2007-11-19, open * ACTION-328 on William Eburn to Propose techniques for not obviously spoofable audio presentation based on discussion above suitable for 8.3.2 - due 2007-11-12, open * ACTION-329 on Bruno von Niman to Review 8.2 to ensure suitability of language in non-visual contexts - due 2007-11-12, open Discharging ACTION-327, I've made some changes to the editor's draft, in sections 8.1.1, 8.1.2 and 8.3.2, thereby probably stepping into ACTION-328 territory as well. Specifically: - In 8.1.1, I've chagned "part" to "facet" to better capture that there might not be any parts in the visual sense. Better wording choices highly welcome; I couldn't come up with anything better. - I've added a brief note to 8.2.3 saying: "A known technique for user agents that expose a voice-based user interface is to chose different voices for the presentation of Web content and metainformation." - I've added a brief note to 8.1.3 saying: User agents SHOULD make use of trusted path techniques to communicate security context information, see 8.2.3 Techniques. I'm not entirely happy with this; the motivation here is that the techniques we seemed to identify at the face-to-face to avoid mixing in audio contexts were all coming from the trusted path corner. Improvements owuld be very welcome; in particular, I look forward to seeing proposals from William and Bruno on how to improve this. -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2007 14:46:32 UTC