- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:47:19 -0500
- To: "Doyle, Bill" <wdoyle@mitre.org>
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF3E7FC192.53745314-ON85257393.005130CC-85257393.00513C8B@LocalDomain>
You're still not looking at the right document Bill. Please read my EVERY word :-) http://www.w3.org/TR/wsc-xit/ Mez Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office (t/l 333-6389) Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect From: "Doyle, Bill" <wdoyle@mitre.org> To: "Mary Ellen Zurko" <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com> Cc: <public-wsc-wg@w3.org> Date: 11/14/2007 08:22 AM Subject: RE: ACTION-318: Draft a new subsection to section 7 discussing the mixing of trusted/untrusted information in the UI could go under section 9 - problems with status quo Secured and non-secured content is mixed From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mary Ellen Zurko Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 7:50 AM To: Doyle, Bill Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org Subject: RE: ACTION-318: Draft a new subsection to section 7 discussing the mixing of trusted/untrusted information in the UI I believe the referernce is to wsc-xit, not wsc-usecases. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-wsc-wg/2007Oct/0011.html And I agree; section 7 doesn't look like the right place to me. If it's about mixing trusted and untrusted info in certs; maybe sections 4 or 8? Johnathan, Thomas, Tyler - you were all on the discussion; any better recall? Mez Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office (t/l 333-6389) Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect From: "Doyle, Bill" <wdoyle@mitre.org> To: "Doyle, Bill" <wdoyle@mitre.org>, <public-wsc-wg@w3.org> Date: 11/09/2007 03:48 PM Subject: RE: ACTION-381: Draft a new subsection to section 7 discussing the mixing of trusted/untrusted information in the UI Seems like UI issues and mixing of trusted/untrusted information should go under this heading 2.5 Reliable presentation of security information From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Doyle, Bill Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 3:24 PM To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org Subject: ACTION-381: Draft a new subsection to section 7 discussing the mixing of trusted/untrusted information in the UI If I have this action right I am not sure if this belongs in section 7 - The section is titled Security Information Available to the User Agent Furthermore, section 7 has a heading titled "defined by user agent" and UI is defined by user agent. Is the WG making a statement that this particular UI decision should not be left up to browser developer community? I am thinking that section 7 is the inputs and UI is an output, UI is the application or use of security information. Do we need a new section? Cheers Bill D.
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2007 14:47:40 UTC