- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:47:19 -0500
- To: "Doyle, Bill" <wdoyle@mitre.org>
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF3E7FC192.53745314-ON85257393.005130CC-85257393.00513C8B@LocalDomain>
You're still not looking at the right document Bill. Please read my EVERY
word :-)
http://www.w3.org/TR/wsc-xit/
Mez
Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office (t/l 333-6389)
Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect
From:
"Doyle, Bill" <wdoyle@mitre.org>
To:
"Mary Ellen Zurko" <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
Cc:
<public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Date:
11/14/2007 08:22 AM
Subject:
RE: ACTION-318: Draft a new subsection to section 7 discussing the mixing
of trusted/untrusted information in the UI
could go under section 9 - problems with status quo
Secured and non-secured content is mixed
From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Mary Ellen Zurko
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 7:50 AM
To: Doyle, Bill
Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: ACTION-318: Draft a new subsection to section 7 discussing
the mixing of trusted/untrusted information in the UI
I believe the referernce is to wsc-xit, not wsc-usecases.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-wsc-wg/2007Oct/0011.html
And I agree; section 7 doesn't look like the right place to me. If it's
about mixing trusted and untrusted info in certs; maybe sections 4 or 8?
Johnathan, Thomas, Tyler - you were all on the discussion; any better
recall?
Mez
Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office (t/l 333-6389)
Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect
From:
"Doyle, Bill" <wdoyle@mitre.org>
To:
"Doyle, Bill" <wdoyle@mitre.org>, <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Date:
11/09/2007 03:48 PM
Subject:
RE: ACTION-381: Draft a new subsection to section 7 discussing the mixing
of trusted/untrusted information in the UI
Seems like UI issues and mixing of trusted/untrusted information should go
under this heading
2.5 Reliable presentation of security information
From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Doyle, Bill
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 3:24 PM
To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Subject: ACTION-381: Draft a new subsection to section 7 discussing the
mixing of trusted/untrusted information in the UI
If I have this action right I am not sure if this belongs in section 7 -
The section is titled Security Information Available to the User Agent
Furthermore, section 7 has a heading titled "defined by user agent" and UI
is defined by user agent. Is the WG making a statement that this
particular UI decision should not be left up to browser developer
community?
I am thinking that section 7 is the inputs and UI is an output, UI is the
application or use of security information. Do we need a new section?
Cheers
Bill D.
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2007 14:47:40 UTC