- From: <michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 14:15:19 -0600
- To: <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Cc: <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <9D471E876696BE4DA103E939AE64164D6C77B0@msgswbmnmsp17.wellsfargo.com>
I'd choose James Earl Jones for the Security Metadata Voice. :) But in all seriousness, visually challenged users do need an easy way to distinguish content from chrome, and I can't think of anything more natural than to use different voices. _____ From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mary Ellen Zurko Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 2:44 PM To: McCormick, Mike Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org Subject: RE: ISSUE-115: Mixing of security information and content in non-visual environments? [Techniques] I love this idea, but I fear it's because it tickles my funny bone to be able to choose a meta data voice (Archangel Gabriel? my mother?). William, Robert, anyone - what do we know about how security context information today, like the padlock, is handled by non visual interfaces? Mez From: <michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com> To: <dan.schutzer@fstc.org>, <public-wsc-wg@w3.org> Date: 10/03/2007 03:18 PM Subject: RE: ISSUE-115: Mixing of security information and content in non-visual environments? [Techniques] _____ Maybe the speech-enabled agent should use two different voices - one for metadata (including but not limited to security context) and another for content. -----Original Message----- From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org <mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org> ] On Behalf Of Dan Schutzer Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 11:01 AM To: 'Web Security Context Working Group WG' Subject: RE: ISSUE-115: Mixing of security information and content in non-visual environments? [Techniques] I am not expert on how we currently handle non-visual environments, but one could approach this in a similar manner. For example, when a visually-impaired user accesses a page which is audio only; the page could be broken into two pieces. The first piece would be a heading/preface that cannot be modified by the webservice, provides security and other chrome info and is spoken by a distinctive voice that differs from the rest of the spoken web page, the content -----Original Message----- From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org <mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org> ] On Behalf Of Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 11:48 AM To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org Subject: ISSUE-115: Mixing of security information and content in non-visual environments? [Techniques] ISSUE-115: Mixing of security information and content in non-visual environments? [Techniques] http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/ <http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/> Raised by: Thomas Roessler On product: Techniques We currently have material concerning the mixing of security information and context in non-visual environments. Is there a useful generalization of the requirement to non-visual UIs? Are there problematic known cases similar to the location bar favicon mix known for, e.g., screen readers?
Received on Monday, 5 November 2007 20:15:57 UTC