- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 13:12:29 +0100
- To: WSC WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
I'm including the favicon strawman proposal from this morning below.
The purpose is to illustrate what kinds of elements should be really
part of the structure of requirements eventually suggested, in line
with the proposal I made at [1].
1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007May/0165.html
Elements marked with an asterisk (*) would be the bare minimum we'd
aim at for an FPWD.
Cheers,
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
(*) Title
Goals
Overview
(*) Applicable to Implementations
User agent with ability to display bitmap graphics.
(*) Requirement
Implementations must not display bitmaps from
[ unverified | unauthenticated ] sources [ near places
that are designated for trust indicators ].
[ Verified | authenticated ] sources are defined as ...
[ Places that are designated for display of trust
indicators ] are defined as ...
(*) Techniques
* favicons are not displayed as part the location bar
* favicons are not displayed along with certificate
information
* favicons are not displayed within 10cm of a security
indicator
* ...
Dependencies
Examples (informational)
Conforming implementation:
* LocationBar^2
Non-conforming implementation:
* Current web browsers that display the favicon as part
of the location bar.
Use-cases (informational)
Attack resistance / limitations
Usability effect
* expected user behavior
* disruption
Background (informational)
....
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2007 12:12:43 UTC