Re: ACTION-186: Review process chapter of Note

> |  least two web user agents. Entrance to Proposed Recommendations
> |  required two interoperable implementations of each feature of a
> |  specification.
> 
[...]
> 
> I wonder if we want to make the implementation in the context of at
> least two web user agents an additional success criterion for CR --
> we can certainly do so.  Maybe worth a discussion.

I think it's a good idea. We really need those implemenations that early 
for our testing, since the testing is iterative. Move them up to Feb 08 
(from May 08). 

http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/TimeLine

> 
> |  All test development and testing is iterative. The
> |  recommendations may need to be modified on the basis of all
> |  three types of testing. starts when work on the specification
> |  starts.
> 
> There's an incomplete sentence here.

Proposed change to last sentence "Test development starts when work on the 
specification starts."

> |  At a minimum, we will find the resources to do "lo-fi"
> |  prototyping for usability testing [[153]Tiny Fingers]. Volunteer
> |  participants will be found through WG member organization.
> 
> I read this as a commitment that we're making toward the community
> overall.  I hope everybody is on board with that.

Yup. You all better be :-). Holler now if you all are not. 

> 
> |  We will pursue resources that allow us to do more extensive
> |  usability testing, including:
> 
> I agree with the substance of this, but wonder if we can find
> wording that is a bit more engaging for folks possibly able to
> provide such resources.
> 
> Thoughts, anyone?

Rachna? Martiza? Stuart? Tyler? Anyone else?
        Mez