- From: Doyle, Bill <wdoyle@mitre.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:59:13 -0400
- To: "Doyle, Bill" <wdoyle@mitre.org>, "Rachna Dhamija" <rachna.w3c@gmail.com>
- Cc: <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <518C60F36D5DBC489E91563736BA4B58018A223A@IMCSRV5.MITRE.ORG>
Tyler, started a review - stopped in item 4, will get back to it. Seems like we have some issues with threat trees. I noted items that I thought had scope issues 1. luring attacks D. all E all F all 2.Site impersonation A. ii. 4. Cross-site scripting - only interested in is how the user agent responds to certain attacks in this class. >From text, the pretense of the attack is injection of cone into vulnerable web applications, server side processing is out of scope and attacking the server is out of scope. Thought - Restructure section to note user agent actions and ability to retain secure posture in the face of Cross-site scripting threats. Server sends data that does X. Leave out how / why this occurs, it just does. B ________________________________ From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Doyle, Bill Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 6:46 AM To: Rachna Dhamija Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org Subject: RE: Public comments on threat trees Thanks - was wondering what was up. Will take a look at it. Usually the MITRE infosec group does not hold back much, depends on who gets a hold of it. Bill ________________________________ From: Rachna Dhamija [mailto:rachna.w3c@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 8:52 PM To: Doyle, Bill Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: Public comments on threat trees Bill, There is currently no "owner" (Stuart S is transitioning jobs, and I don't know if he is still participating in the workgroup). I've been adding attacks as I think of them and have flattened it out to be more of an outline, rather than a "tree". We still need to add links to examples and to identify which branches are in and out of scope. I'm not sure that we'll ever be "done" with adding new attacks, so this is a good time as any to get comments and find things we have missed. Perhaps you and Stephen F might like to make one pass through it first. http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/ThreatTrees Rachna On 6/25/07, Doyle, Bill < wdoyle@mitre.org> wrote: Are threat trees ready for public comments? If so I will send the a wiki link out to MITRE infosec list. If threat tree owner can respond and provide any intro and link it would be appreciated. Regards Bill Doyle wdoyle@mitre.org
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2007 16:59:28 UTC