- From: <michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:13:06 -0500
- To: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
- Cc: <dan.schutzer@fstc.org>, <wdoyle@mitre.org>, <hahnt@us.ibm.com>, <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
I agree. I believe this will prove to be the case if we try the score based approach. We certainly must do something to boil all the security/trust info available to the agent down to a single UI that's intuitive but granular (not binary). The particular formula I proposed may be crazy (it's untested) but I think the basic concept is sound. My scoring formula just gives us a starting point for iterative discussion & testing. Mike -----Original Message----- From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 8:52 AM To: Dan Schutzer Cc: 'Doyle, Bill'; 'Timothy Hahn'; public-wsc-wg@w3.org Subject: RE: Page Security Score proposal > Yes, but what are the colors referring to? Whatever. I think its interesting to think about them not being defined at all, but just being something that the users gets to know themselves over time. Might be a crazy idea of course, but at least its different from the padlock, which is IMO a necessary condition for improvement:-) S.
Received on Monday, 18 June 2007 19:14:08 UTC