- From: Timothy Hahn <hahnt@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 07:38:09 -0400
- To: Web Security Context WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF46EF2678.8BF02741-ON852572F7.003E690E-852572F7.003FEB56@us.ibm.com>
Mez, I can't think of a better categorization, so +1 from me for the categories below. Regards, Tim Hahn IBM Distinguished Engineer Internet: hahnt@us.ibm.com Internal: Timothy Hahn/Durham/IBM@IBMUS phone: 919.224.1565 tie-line: 8/687.1565 fax: 919.224.2530 "Mary Ellen Zurko" <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com> Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org 06/08/07 04:28 PM To "Shawn Duffy <Shawn.Duffy" cc Web Security Context WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org> Subject Re: Recommendations Draft Now that I've made it through the proposals that make up the bulk of the draft, I'd like to propose a further categorization of the proposals: 1. Primary Security Context Indicators Proposals centering on what is displayed as SCI (and not) would go here. Site identifying images in chrome, "what is a secure page" (when it gets put into template form - Yngve, have you done that yet?), secure internet letterhead, TrustMe, UrlRecommendation, IdentitySignal - recommendations, good practices, and antipatterns around the SCI that appear without user interaction, in the normal task flow, would appear here. 2. Secondary Security Context Indicators Proposals centering around other forms of SCI - security protocol error presentation, page info summary, EV certs (I think), maybe parts of IdentitySignal (is hoverover primary or secondary?), revisiting past decisions would go here. 3. SCI Robustness Techniques to make the SCI (and chrome) robust against attacks (including spoofing). Trusted browser component (including the personalization aspect), and all the discussions of robustness we've had from the various browsers would go here. 4. Minimizing Trust Decisions Techniques to do away with some of the trust decisions users need to make today. PIIEditorBar, SBM, maybe browser lock down (I haven't read it yet) Reactions and thoughts, both on beginning to form some large grained categories within our proposal, and on these as the current categories? Mez Shawn Duffy <Shawn.Duffy@corp.aol.com> Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org 05/30/2007 05:30 AM To Web Security Context WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org> cc Subject Recommendations Draft This is a rough, rough first draft of the Recommendations: http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/ This is based on the recommendations that were drafted using Tyler's template in the Wiki. Not every one used the template in an identical manner so not every section is consistent with the rest. I'm sure we will continue to massage the format. If I am missing anyone's recommendations, let me know... Thanks, Shawn -- shawn duffy - shawn.duffy@corp.aol.com senior technical security engineer | aol it security 703.265.8273 | AIM: ShawnDuffy1
Received on Monday, 11 June 2007 11:38:34 UTC