- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 12:24:48 -0400
- To: rachna.public@gmail.com
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF8724A584.C990DF2A-ON852572F4.005939CB-852572F4.005A2CF3@LocalDomain>
"The user shares a secret with the Trusted Browser Component. The shared secret may be an image selected by the user, or can be another type of secret (e.g., text or audio) to meet accessibility requirements. The shared secret creates a "trusted path" between the user and the Trusted Browser Component. Examples of user customized website and browser interfaces include [4], [5] and [6]. " This part definately seems in scope, and as I mentioned in PIIEditorBar, Perhaps you can put it into conformance language. "The first time the user visits a trusted website or wishes to create an account at such a website, he must create an association between the browser and "trusted website"(e.g., the browser may automatically recognize that this is a website that supports this login mechanism, the user may be required to perform an action to make an association, the user may be required to supply an out of band activation code). This step represents a one-time trust decision by the user (usability testing is required to determine if users can accomplish this task). This trust decision can be supported with information supplied by the browser (EV status, user's history with the website, others' history with the website). " Asking users for one time trust decisions is definately in scope (that's what SSL does today with self signed certs). I'd very much like to see recommendations abstract enough to support a variety of implementations of those trust decisions, and some usability testing on the topic, in our WG. So I'd like to see you carry this part forward as well. The Login part also seems phrased to keep it all in scope, and I can see working with basic password management tools in that context as alternative examples. Mez Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office (t/l 333-6389) Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect "Rachna Dhamija" <rachna.public@gmail.com> Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org 05/24/2007 01:13 PM To public-wsc-wg@w3.org cc Subject Action 213: write a lightning proposal on wiki I added a proposal to the wiki. This opens up a question for the group: are interfaces to out of scope protocols within our scope? Trusted Browser Component to Capture User Intention http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/TrustedBrowserComponent
Received on Friday, 8 June 2007 16:25:14 UTC