Re: ACTION-205: Update PageInfo Proposal after discussion

I love the history part. 

The PageInfoSummary should be aligned with our recommendations on how SCIs 
are displayed. In particular, it seems like good practice to me to call 
out which information contributed to the state (or lack thereof) of the 
SCI primary display, assuming there is one. I'm specifically thinking that 
this would be aligned with What is a Secure Page, as they both get 
templatized and conformance communicating. 

          Mez

Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office       (t/l 333-6389)
Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect




Johnathan Nightingale <johnath@mozilla.com> 
Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org
05/16/2007 10:15 AM

To
W3C WSC W3C WSC Public <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
cc

Subject
ACTION-205: Update PageInfo Proposal after discussion







Hey folks,

I have updated the proposal to reflect the lightning discussion round 
in April on the subject.  The current recommendation can be found here.

http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/PageInfoSummary

  I haven't yet put it into template form, but in any case I think 
that falls outside this action item.  One notable change from the 
earlier revision is that I broke out minimum information vs. 
optional, lest we have a recommendation which starts piling every 
piece of available information in just because it can be.

Cheers,

Johnathan

---
Johnathan Nightingale
Human Shield
johnath@mozilla.com