- From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:59:48 +0100
- To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Cc: W3 Work Group <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote: > I agree, I think we do. Or will in the end. Whichever:-) I reckon we just need to map to something like: - UA proposals for PKI - being things we think could be done (better) with all the PKI gunk we (i.e. PKIX) have thrown over the wall to/at the UA folks - that is probably a subsection of a bigger one that deals with TLS handling - Proposals for CA operators - being how we (i.e. WSC) understand stuff like EV-certs and maybe some additional stuff we'd like that's similar to what CAB forum do If we use a phrase like "SHOULD be...trustworthy" I think it can only occur in the second one, not the first. (The 1st one could talk about the user calling something "trustworthy," but that'd be non-normative text I guess.) Basically, I want to keep the normative/UA stuff separate from the "here's how to be an even nicer CA for browsers" stuff. Stephen.
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2007 12:58:11 UTC