ACTION-250: propose breaking out 2.4 into its own proposal.recommendation

Section 2.4 of the draft on recommendations [1], deals with a
number of PKI related things, that, I think, should be separated.

I think removing the advice to CA operators from here to elsewhere
is the thing to do. Stuff like:

    "CAs who issue high grade SSL certificates (such as EV) ought to
    remind requesters that logographic imagery is subject to trademark
    laws and the requester is responsible to ensure the logo they supply
    to the RA is (a) legal for use in all countries and (b) visually
    distinguishable from other logos."

...belongs in its own "Proposals for CA operators" part and
shouldn't be mixed with guidance for UA vendors on when to display
PKI stuff.

Stephen.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/#favicon-certlogos-rec

Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2007 09:41:54 UTC