- From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:38:06 +0100
- To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
- CC: Rachna Dhamija <rachna.public@gmail.com>
Just wondering about this. In an otherwise excellent post Rachna said: > If you disagree with anything here, please edit the wiki! That seems to me to require me to disagree twice, and is a pattern I think I've seen going by. Twice meaning: once editing the wiki and once replying to the email with some context and a relevant link. Notwithstanding the fact that I'm not shy about disagreeing, I think once is often enough :-) If an email thread peters out, then that's ok since there's no interest in the counterpoint; if not, and the criticism sticks, then we all know that someone should update the wiki, and the original author seems like fair game then. But, I've been disengaged for a bit now, and so maybe this has been working just fine, though it seems like it could create a masquerade of non-objection as concensus (if you know what I mean). Thought I'd ask anyway, S.
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2007 00:36:35 UTC