RE: ANEC'scomments on the “Web Security Experience, Indicators and Trust: Scope and Use Cases” working draft (March 02, 2007)

Hi Mez,

 

Well…the ANEC process requires such an approach, as the comments proposal I develop needs to be passed around and commented and approved by the ANEC ICT Programme Manager, the W3CProject Team and sometimes, the ICT Working Group, before submission to W3C. 

 

If the team (Thomas, I guess:-)) cannot enter the comments into the system and convert them into tracked issues (like in other WGs- please confirm if this is the case), I will do it myself (although it implies some double-work and as a contracted consultant, the time I spend with the W3C AC and various WGs is, unfortunately, strictly limited and sharply planned; I’d rather spend it on the content. Hower, I’ll comply, if necessary!).

 

Have a good one, all

Bruno

  _____  

From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mary Ellen Zurko
Sent: den 31 maj 2007 16:25
To: Bruno von Niman
Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: ANEC'scomments on the “Web Security Experience, Indicators and Trust: Scope and Use Cases” working draft (March 02, 2007)

 


Thank you Bruno. 

One process point. As a WG participant you know that all comments that need follow through need to be turned into tracked Issues. For any comments coming from a WG participant, it's their responsibility to ensure that that happens. So I'm asking you to be sure that these comments get turned into the right set of Issues. 
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/track/issues/open

As a WG member, I will of course review and comment, and I encourage everyone else to do so. 

          Mez

Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office       (t/l 333-6389)
Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect





"Bruno von Niman" <ANEC_W3CRep_Bruno@vonniman.com> 

05/31/2007 06:07 AM


To

"'Mary Ellen Zurko'" <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>, "'Thomas Roessler'" <tlr@w3.org>


cc

<public-wsc-wg@w3.org>, <public-usable-authentication@w3.org>


Subject

ANEC'scomments on the “Web Security Experience, Indicators and Trust: Scope and Use Cases” working draft (March 02, 2007)

 


 

 




Dear Mez, Thomas and Colleagues,
 
See attached ANEC’s ( <http://www.anec.org/> www.anec.org) comments (including general and specific ones) on the “Web Security Experience, Indicators and Trust: Scope and Use Cases” working draft (dated March 02, 2007) submitted for your attention.
We assume that this submission is timely, given the fact that no date for the submission of comments has been announced.
We regret that I cannot attend the Dublin F2F due to the airline strike mentioned previously; it was our intention to present the comments and develop them in more detail as discussed, if necessary.
We look forward to your reply and the updated version of the “Notes” document!
With best regards,
Bruno von Niman
ANEC W3C Representative

 

  _____  


From: Bruno von Niman [mailto:ANEC_W3CRep_Bruno@vonniman.com] 
Sent: den 30 maj 2007 11:08
To: 'Mary Ellen Zurko'; 'Thomas Roessler'
Cc: 'public-wsc-wg@w3.org'; 'Bruno von Niman'
Subject: Cancelling meeting attendance; how handle comments?
Importance: High
 
Dear Mez, Thomas and Colleagues,
 
It’s very unfortunate but I have to cancel my attendance of the Dublin F2F due to an airline strike ending today…real bad timing.
In order to make it to Dublin and spend some reasonable time (1 ½ days) with you, I needed to leave yesterday, when the Swedish branch of SAS (Scandinavian Airlines) were still on strike and not flying at all…
They are (trying to) fly(ing) today (with the following chaos causing half-day delays) but that’s anyhow too late as I needed to leave Dublin just before lunch tomorrow. I am very sorry- all arrangements were made and I was really looking forward to spend some good time with you 8in the meeting as well as the evening activities).
 
I have two questions:
1. Is there a way allowing for remote participation? Phone line, scripting,…? If so, I could join, at least when relevant agenda items are discussed;
2. I have prepared some detailed comments on the Note document. Fortunately, it’s written ones, as they needed to be approved by ANEC before submission. The question is: shall I send it to you now, to take it into consideration during the F2F or would you prefer addressing them post-Dublin?
 
I look forward to your feedback-have a great meeting,
Bruno[attachment "W3C Web Security ANEC comments (ANEC-ICT-2007-G-054 Part 2).doc" deleted by Mary Ellen Zurko/Westford/IBM]