- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:24:18 -0400
- To: "Thomas Roessler <tlr" <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF39B7558A.423EFEF5-ON85257328.00755F1D-85257328.007595BE@LocalDomain>
I'm unclear how this interacts with other proposals in terms of inputting data (particularly login credentials) the first few times I visit such a site. It sounds like the recommendation would make them look totally unidentified. Is that right? I think I'd need to consider this in the context of, say, Identity Signal to understand the impact and implications. Mez Re: ACTION-272: self-signed certificates Thomas Roessler to: public-wsc-wg 07/26/2007 11:54 AM Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org I've added the material on self-signed certificates to the wiki, and to the recommendation proposal index: http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/RecSelfSigned Regards, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> On 2007-07-26 10:24:58 -0500, Thomas Roessler wrote: > From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> > To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org > Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:24:58 -0500 > Subject: ACTION-272: self-signed certificates > X-Spam-Level: > X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.5 > > Attached, you'll find a proposal on how to deal with self-signed > certificates; credit for 99% of the content goes to Stephen. I'll > put it in the wiki as soon as I've found a useful converter, which > will be during the next very few hours. > > Regards, > -- > Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 30 July 2007 21:24:39 UTC