- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:24:18 -0400
- To: "Thomas Roessler <tlr" <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF39B7558A.423EFEF5-ON85257328.00755F1D-85257328.007595BE@LocalDomain>
I'm unclear how this interacts with other proposals in terms of inputting
data (particularly login credentials) the first few times I visit such a
site. It sounds like the recommendation would make them look totally
unidentified. Is that right? I think I'd need to consider this in the
context of, say, Identity Signal to understand the impact and
implications.
Mez
Re: ACTION-272: self-signed certificates
Thomas Roessler
to:
public-wsc-wg
07/26/2007 11:54 AM
Sent by:
public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org
I've added the material on self-signed certificates to the wiki, and
to the recommendation proposal index:
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/RecSelfSigned
Regards,
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
On 2007-07-26 10:24:58 -0500, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
> To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:24:58 -0500
> Subject: ACTION-272: self-signed certificates
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.5
>
> Attached, you'll find a proposal on how to deal with self-signed
> certificates; credit for 99% of the content goes to Stephen. I'll
> put it in the wiki as soon as I've found a useful converter, which
> will be during the next very few hours.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 30 July 2007 21:24:39 UTC