Re: ISSUE-73: Proposed changes to process chapter

current text:

| At a minimum, we will find the resources to do "lo-fi" prototyping
| with a modest number of volunteers (10-20) for each recommendation
| where user feedback appears necessary [Tiny Fingers]. Volunteer
| participants will be found through WG member organizations.

Reword as (with small change per your response, since I certainly
didn't mean to suggest we should go below 10 subjects):

> The Working Group aims to perform lo fidelity prototyping and
> testing with a modest number of test subjects (10-20) for each proposed
> practice that involves user feedback [Tiny Fingers].  This will be
> reflected in Candidate Recommendation exit criteria.

current text:

| We will pursue resources that allow us to do more extensive
| usability testing, including:

Proposed:

> More extensive user testing will be desirable, and is expected to
> contribute to higher-quality outcomes.  More extensive tests may
> include:

The basic theme being to describe the goals, not the means, in the
note.

-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>








On 2007-07-30 14:03:31 -0400, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:
> From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
> To: "Thomas Roessler <tlr" <tlr@w3.org>
> Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:03:31 -0400
> Subject: Re: ISSUE-73: Proposed changes to process chapter
> List-Id: <public-wsc-wg.w3.org>
> X-Spam-Level: 
> X-Archived-At:
> 	http://www.w3.org/mid/OFC353004A.B139A065-ON85257328.0062AFBE-85257328.006333D1@LocalDomain
> 	X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.5
> 
> Can you fold it into a fully proposed change? I can't figure out exactly 
> what you're asking for, so can't respond. tx. 
> 
> 
>           Mez
> 
> Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office       (t/l 333-6389)
> Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Re: ISSUE-73: Proposed changes to process chapter
> 
> Thomas Roessler 
> to:
> Mary Ellen Zurko
> 07/30/2007 01:56 PM
> 
> 
> Sent by:
> public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org
> Cc:
> public-wsc-wg
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 2007-07-30 12:28:25 -0400, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:
> 
> > I for one can't figure out what the concrete proposal is. Can
> > someone (perhaps Thomas) state the exact change?
> 
> The proposed changes are here:
> 
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007Jul/0074.html
> 
> You seemed a little bit unhappy with at least one aspect:
> 
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007Jul/0098.html
> 
> I responded here:
> 
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007Jul/0099.html
> 
> ... and was hoping for a response to the content of that.  (Which
> hadn't come for a while.)
> 
> Regards,
> -- 
> Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
> 
> 
>

Received on Monday, 30 July 2007 18:44:39 UTC