- From: Dan Schutzer <dan.schutzer@fstc.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 06:49:01 -0400
- To: "'Mary Ellen Zurko'" <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>, "'Thomas Roessler'" <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <00e501c7cea9$6a53f330$6500a8c0@dschutzer>
How about: The suggested standards in this document are intended to conform to the standards and best practices coming out of the work of other efforts, such as P3P, WAI and Internet filters. In those cases were we recommend building and extending some of this work, as in the case of Safe Web Browsing and filtering, it is noted in the recommendation. Dan _____ From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mary Ellen Zurko Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 6:11 PM To: Thomas Roessler Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: P3P, , Internet filters and WAI Since the topic keeps coming up, saying something should help. I would very much like someone to propose something even better than what I proposed. Mez Re: P3P, , Internet filters and WAI Thomas Roessler to: Mary Ellen Zurko 07/22/2007 03:03 PM Cc: public-wsc-wg _____ On 2007-07-20 08:00:41 -0400, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote: > I propose we add the following paragraph to what is currently the > end of the overview (I also considered this for goals or scope, > so if someone thinks it should be there instead, please say): > As a W3C working group, we will be developing to W3C standards. Of course we are, but not only. I wonder if this statement isn't likely to cause more confusion than enlightenment among readers -- one way to misread it (absurdly) would be to claim that we're not paying attention to anything but W3C statements. Maybe this is another case of trying to restate very general and very fundamental principles, but poorly? Just a thought... -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2007 10:49:33 UTC