- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:59:37 +0200
- To: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Cc: "Johnathan Nightingale <johnath" <johnath@mozilla.com>, W3C WSC W3C WSC Public <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
On 2007-07-19 08:23:46 -0400, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote: > "Whether the user has any saved credentials for this site " Sounds good to me. > Is there anything tricky or subtle here? For example, if there > are ways to plug in credential management extensions to the user > agent, then the user agent might not know. Would a better wording > be "Whether the user has any saved credentials for this site > through web user agent functionality"? I don't think we should introduce the structure of implementations into compliance language -- that gets us right back into the discussions where the boundaries of the operating system really are. If a browser is extended in a way that breaks compliance, well, bad for the compliance of the resulting package. Therefore, +1 to the original language, -1 to the proposed change. Regards, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 19 July 2007 12:59:42 UTC