- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:36:47 +0200
- To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
(In the interest of time, there's no list of closed action items in this agenda. I'll either send a revised version later / early tomorrow, or let MEZ catch that particular slack at the next meeting.) Web Security Context (WSC) Call Agenda Calling information: Wednesday, 11 July 2007 11:00 am - 12:30 pm Eastern time http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/#meetings Chair pro tempore: Thomas Regrets: MEZ Agenda 1. Administrivia; pick scribe http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/cheatsheet#Scribing 2. Approve mintues from last meeting http://www.w3.org/2007/07/11-wsc-minutes 3. Agenda bashing 4. wsc-usecases progress toward last call http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/wsc-usecases/ Editor's report: Tyler, what has happened recently? What's the current state of section 7? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007Jul/0071.html ISSUE-6 looks ripe; see latest messages linked from here: http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/track/issues/6 ISSUE-38 has a proposal from MEZ and no objections. PROPOSED to adopt the text and close the issue: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007Jul/0153.html Proposal to close 11 issues; paging von Niman and Yonaitis http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007Jul/0212.html Subject: Re: ISSUE-78: Definitions PROPOSED: to reassign this issue to the rec-track deliverables. Subject: Re: ISSUE-79: Understandability of security settings PROPOSED: to close without changing Note text. Subject: Re: ISSUE-80: Non-visual (multiomodal) presentation of security information PROPOSED: to close unless there's a concrete proposal for change of the Note. Subject: Re: ISSUE-81: Mobile Web in Scope PROPOSED: to close without change to text, but note that MWBP WG be asked to review early working draft of rec-track deliverable. Subject: Re: ISSUE-82: Shared use in public spaces and homes PROPOSED: to close without change; this topic has seen extensive discussion in the group, and no new information was supplied in raising the issue that would justify re-opening this question. Subject: Re: ISSUE-84: User/consumer education PROPOSED: to close without change. Subject: Re: ISSUE-86: Accessibility PROPOSED: to close without change, but note that there are liaison mechanisms with WAI in place. Subject: Re: ISSUE-88: Recommend the use of information architecture and design technologies PROPOSED: to close without change, unless a concrete proposal is made in time for the call. Subject: Re: ISSUE-89: Multimodality of indicators PROPOSED: to close; duplicates ISSUE-80 Subject: Re: ISSUE-93: Multi-platform compatibility PROPOSED: to close without change; would lead to poor restatement of core principles. Subject: Re: ISSUE-94: More f-looking and future-proof? PROPOSED: to close; points a, c, d out of scope; point b covered by ISSUE-87. 5. rec-track document update http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/ Editor's report: Shawn, where are we? What's missing? Who's lacking conformance language? 6. Self Signed Certificates (Stephen Farrell) 7. BrowserLockDown (Tim Hahn) http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/RecommendationDisplayProposals/BrowserLockDown Regards, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2007 15:36:53 UTC