- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:36:47 +0200
- To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
(In the interest of time, there's no list of closed action items in
this agenda. I'll either send a revised version later / early
tomorrow, or let MEZ catch that particular slack at the next
meeting.)
Web Security Context (WSC) Call Agenda
Calling information:
Wednesday, 11 July 2007
11:00 am - 12:30 pm Eastern time
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/#meetings
Chair pro tempore: Thomas
Regrets: MEZ
Agenda
1. Administrivia; pick scribe
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/cheatsheet#Scribing
2. Approve mintues from last meeting
http://www.w3.org/2007/07/11-wsc-minutes
3. Agenda bashing
4. wsc-usecases progress toward last call
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/wsc-usecases/
Editor's report: Tyler, what has happened recently?
What's the current state of section 7?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007Jul/0071.html
ISSUE-6 looks ripe; see latest messages linked from here:
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/track/issues/6
ISSUE-38 has a proposal from MEZ and no objections.
PROPOSED to adopt the text and close the issue:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007Jul/0153.html
Proposal to close 11 issues; paging von Niman and Yonaitis
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007Jul/0212.html
Subject: Re: ISSUE-78: Definitions
PROPOSED: to reassign this issue to the rec-track deliverables.
Subject: Re: ISSUE-79: Understandability of security settings
PROPOSED: to close without changing Note text.
Subject: Re: ISSUE-80: Non-visual (multiomodal) presentation
of security information
PROPOSED: to close unless there's a concrete proposal for change
of the Note.
Subject: Re: ISSUE-81: Mobile Web in Scope
PROPOSED: to close without change to text, but note that MWBP
WG be asked to review early working draft of rec-track
deliverable.
Subject: Re: ISSUE-82: Shared use in public spaces and homes
PROPOSED: to close without change; this topic has seen
extensive discussion in the group, and no new information was
supplied in raising the issue that would justify re-opening
this question.
Subject: Re: ISSUE-84: User/consumer education
PROPOSED: to close without change.
Subject: Re: ISSUE-86: Accessibility
PROPOSED: to close without change, but note that there are
liaison mechanisms with WAI in place.
Subject: Re: ISSUE-88: Recommend the use of information
architecture and design technologies
PROPOSED: to close without change, unless a concrete proposal is
made in time for the call.
Subject: Re: ISSUE-89: Multimodality of indicators
PROPOSED: to close; duplicates ISSUE-80
Subject: Re: ISSUE-93: Multi-platform compatibility
PROPOSED: to close without change; would lead to poor restatement
of core principles.
Subject: Re: ISSUE-94: More f-looking and future-proof?
PROPOSED: to close; points a, c, d out of scope; point b covered
by ISSUE-87.
5. rec-track document update
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/
Editor's report: Shawn, where are we? What's missing? Who's
lacking conformance language?
6. Self Signed Certificates (Stephen Farrell)
7. BrowserLockDown (Tim Hahn)
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/RecommendationDisplayProposals/BrowserLockDown
Regards,
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2007 15:36:53 UTC