- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 18:09:04 -0400
- To: Web Security Context WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 2 July 2007 22:46:20 UTC
If we need one, sure. If not, we can put it off until the rec track document. What are the terms in wsc-usecases that are used in multiple places that need definitions for readers/reviewers? As a reminder, here's our glossary, though it hasn't gotten much action beyond the great chrome debate: http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/Glossary Web Security Context Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org> Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org 07/02/2007 07:35 AM Please respond to Web Security Context WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org> To public-wsc-wg@w3.org cc Subject ISSUE-78: Definitions ISSUE-78: Definitions http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/track/issues/78 Raised by: Bruno von Niman On product: Note: use cases etc. Shouldn't we add definitions to the document?
Received on Monday, 2 July 2007 22:46:20 UTC