Instructions from organizations on security context information

This could either be a use case (Betty sees potentially conflicting 
information) or problems with status quo (inconsistent use of security 
indicators across reputable and trustworthy sites). Could you work with 
Tyler to figure out which and get it in the Note? 

          Mez

Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office       (t/l 333-6389)
Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect




Maritza Johnson <maritzaj@gmail.com> 
01/19/2007 12:54 PM

To
W3 Work Group <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
cc
Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
Subject
Re: action-39 -- needs update







Sorry for the delay, I added it to the wiki a few weeks ago and forgot to 
notify the list.

It can be found here:
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/ActionNumber39

I'm not sure where this fits into the scope of the note. I believe it came 
up when we were talking about problems with the current interface.





On Jan 19, 2007, at 12:21 PM, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:


Martiza, where are you on action-39? Can you update it to a date you 
believe in, if you haven't done what's needed? Thanks. 
ACTION-39
OPEN
Training users to rely on specific non-ubiquitous security context
Maritza Johnson
2006-12-12



          Mez

Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office       (t/l 333-6389)
Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect




- Maritza

http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~maritzaj/