- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:40:33 -0500
- To: "George Staikos <staikos" <staikos@kde.org>
- Cc: W3 Work Group <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OFB8A1701F.93435CE7-ON8525726C.0050787C-8525726C.00509EE8@LocalDomain>
Good point. So it sounds like the indicators on whether or not the scoping mechanism works, and how things may be tied into the scoping mechanism, are inconsistent so far. Mez Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office (t/l 333-6389) Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect George Staikos <staikos@kde.org> Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org 01/21/2007 10:24 PM To W3 Work Group <public-wsc-wg@w3.org> cc Subject Re: What is a secure page? Hmm does that mean that the location/url bar is going into the tab too? :-) On 17-Jan-07, at 9:35 AM, Stuart E. Schechter wrote: > >>> The FireFox 2 tabs contain a window close button that used to >>> be part >> of >>> the window frame. Presumably they were moved here because users >>> didn't >>> understand, or weren't comfortable with, the model in which a >>> close icon >> for >>> the window closed a tab. >> >> So that sounds like data that could be used to argue the scoping is >> effective. >> >> Mez > > I don't understand the logic there. Firefox 2 is moving away > from the > model in which users are presumed to understand that all browser > buttons > within a window apply to the current tab. They are moving to a > model in > which you have to explicitly show the user that the button applies > to the > tab by putting it into the tab itself. How would you argue that > this change > supports the effectiveness of the scoping? > > > -- George Staikos KDE Developer http://www.kde.org/ Staikos Computing Services Inc. http://www.staikos.net/
Received on Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:40:43 UTC