Re: Browser security warning

> >> that's worth  pursuing, but just not here (since that'd be a new
> >> protocol).
> > 
> >    How are you defining new here?
> 
> I'm not. (Not being the new protocol police:-) But the charter
> seems clear enough on this to me.

The fifth bullet in our out of scope section is meant to address what 
exists and what doesn't:

http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/NoteOutOfScope

If that seems underspecified (and it may be), please do propose richer 
language around it (or continue discussion fleshing out that aspect). 

        The Protocol Police :-)