RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests

I would say go ahead, my comments are not ready yet.

Hal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doyle, Bill [mailto:wdoyle@mitre.org]
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 9:15 AM
> To: Thomas Roessler; Close, Tyler J.
> Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org; Mary Ellen Zurko; Hal Lockhart
> Subject: RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests
> 
> Your call if you want to integrate or not - was going to post to the
> list this AM.
> 
> I have written a note about the protocols capability to change the
> security model of a given web server and capabilities that the
protocol
> must support in order to be viable from an IA perspective.
> 
> 
> B
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Roessler [mailto:tlr@w3.org]
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 5:39 AM
> To: Close, Tyler J.; Doyle, Bill
> Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org; Mary Ellen Zurko; Hal Lockhart
> Subject: Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests
> 
> 
> On 2007-12-05 18:57:40 +0000, Close, Tyler J. wrote:
> 
> > I've got one major comment on this proposal
> 
> *snip*
> 
> On 2007-12-11 15:28:14 -0500, Bill Doyle wrote:
> 
> > This is what i came up with, in reading the protocol I could not
> > determine a servers right to limit use of the proposed
> > extensions.
> 
> *snip*
> 
> Hal, I think I haven't seen your review, yet.
> 
> Tyler, Bill, I believe you haven't submitted your comments to
> public-appformats.  I wonder if it's worth submitting them now, or
> waiting for Hal, and submitting some kind of consolidated comment?
> 
> Thanks,
> --
> Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>

Received on Monday, 17 December 2007 15:32:44 UTC