- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:15:08 -0500
- To: "Timothy Hahn" <Timothy_Hahn%IBMUS@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF50EB7C2A.76BC2DA4-ON852573B1.005C779B-852573B1.005EC532@LocalDomain>
Process point - create an issue for anything you want changed and tracked. It might be best to make a single issue out of any changes you believe to be purely editorial. Response as a participant: Tim, I find PDF super irritating,, as I seem to be unable to copy text to quote it, so it makes it hard to respond to your comments. I disagree with your change of "easier for" to "more likely". Those are two separate thoughts. I agree with the former. I find the latter more watered down and more controversial, at the same time. 5.5.2 - I disagree with the change of "if the user were...". I think the point is that the exposure is real even with the redirects, which your change loses. 10.1 - I don't find the "ideally" part compelling. Not enough meat to explain how the "ideal" would be achieved in all situations (or why those situations where the ideal was not achieved would not be problematic). You've heard me on the not able to "view" thing. And you've heard from others. The two "could" paragraphs are too speculative and too vague for the spec at this time. Totally disagree with 11.4. See discussion of the "view" thing earlier. Mez From: Timothy Hahn/Durham/IBM@IBMUS To: <public-wsc-wg@w3.org> Date: 11/28/2007 03:11 PM Subject: Comments on draft documents posted to the WSC wiki Hi all, I have read the latest draft documents and placed comments via attachments into the group's wiki. See this page for links: http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/DocsRepository Regards, Tim Hahn IBM Distinguished Engineer Internet: hahnt@us.ibm.com Internal: Timothy Hahn/Durham/IBM@IBMUS phone: 919.224.1565 tie-line: 8/687.1565 fax: 919.224.2530
Received on Friday, 14 December 2007 17:15:29 UTC