xit comments Re: Comments on draft documents posted to the WSC wiki

Process point - create an issue for anything you want changed and tracked. 
It might be best to make a single issue out of any changes you believe to 
be purely editorial. 



Response as a participant: 

Tim, I find PDF super irritating,, as I seem to be unable to copy text to 
quote it, so it makes it hard to respond to your comments. 

I disagree with your change of "easier for" to "more likely". Those are 
two separate thoughts. I agree with the former. I find the latter more 
watered down and more controversial, at the same time. 

5.5.2 - I disagree with the change of "if the user were...". I think the 
point is that the exposure is real even with the redirects, which your 
change loses. 

10.1 - I don't find the "ideally" part compelling. Not enough meat to 
explain how the "ideal" would be achieved in all situations (or why those 
situations where the ideal was not achieved would not be problematic). 

You've heard me on the not able to "view" thing. And you've heard from 
others. 

The two "could" paragraphs are too speculative and too vague for the spec 
at this time. 

Totally disagree with 11.4. See discussion of the "view" thing earlier. 

          Mez





From:
Timothy Hahn/Durham/IBM@IBMUS
To:
<public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Date:
11/28/2007 03:11 PM
Subject:
Comments on draft documents posted to the WSC wiki




Hi all, 

I have read the latest draft documents and placed comments via attachments 
into the group's wiki.  See this page for links: 
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/DocsRepository 

Regards, 
Tim Hahn
IBM Distinguished Engineer

Internet: hahnt@us.ibm.com
Internal: Timothy Hahn/Durham/IBM@IBMUS
phone: 919.224.1565     tie-line: 8/687.1565
fax: 919.224.2530