usecases comments Re: Comments on draft documents posted to the WSC wiki

I find the following comments to be NOT editorial changes, requiring the 
creation of an Issue if you want them tracked, discussed, and put into the 
final version: 

Unintended Destination comment - please flesh it out to a full proposal. 

Your comment format irritatingly truncates the right hand side of the 6.5 
table, so any comments in there (and the one directly after) cannot be 
fully appreciated, or acted on. 

The "smartphone" insertion seems out of the blue. 

"composition from multiple items on the same host" does not seem like a 
straightforward re wording of the text removed. I can't tell myself if 
it's an accurate restatement. 

The data and jar uri comment seems misplaced, and I don't understand it. 

"HTTP header information" comment has no references. 

Ditto for "DNS lookup results". 

In this context, "installed extensions" seems like an oxymoron, since 
other items there have used "installed" to mean "pre installed with the 
browser". 

Any comments with a "?" need a concrete proposal. 


I find all OTHER comments to be editorial. The suggestion on a XSS 
reference can be satisfied with a link to Wikipedia's article on it. On 
those, I'm starting the "consensus" time clock. Silence for an extended 
period of time will imply it, at which point that will signal the decision 
to incorporate them. 

          Mez




From:
Timothy Hahn/Durham/IBM@IBMUS
To:
<public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Date:
11/28/2007 03:11 PM
Subject:
Comments on draft documents posted to the WSC wiki




Hi all, 

I have read the latest draft documents and placed comments via attachments 
into the group's wiki.  See this page for links: 
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/DocsRepository 

Regards, 
Tim Hahn
IBM Distinguished Engineer

Internet: hahnt@us.ibm.com
Internal: Timothy Hahn/Durham/IBM@IBMUS
phone: 919.224.1565     tie-line: 8/687.1565
fax: 919.224.2530