W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-semann@w3.org > May 2007

RE: Test suite SAWSDL update

From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 15:52:59 +0200
To: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
Cc: public-ws-semann@w3.org
Message-Id: <1180101179.15275.23.camel@localhost>

Hi Jonathan, the answer is yes.

The behavior should show up on a number of the test cases:
05-simpletype-annotation.wsdl propagates mRef from simple type
06-complextype-annotation.wsdl propagates mRef from complex type
06-multiple-complextype-annotation.wsdl checks set merging on propagation
10-type-lifting.wsdl propagates liftingSM from simple type
12-* propagate loweringSM from complex type
13-* have propagation overriding

Note that 06-... are updated because previously only an embedded element
declaration referenced the global type definition with a sawsdl
annotation, so no propagation would show up in the WSDL components.

If you generate the results for these test cases, I'll be happy to
eyeball them for correctness. 8-)

If you wish, for some of the cases I could also add test files that are
equivalent after propagation, i.e. as though the propagation was done
manually.

Jacek

On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 10:53 -0700, Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> So wsdl-xslt should add all three annotations to the Element Declaration
> Component that appear on the Type Definition Component that it references
> (if it does reference one)?
> 
> Hoping the answer is yes I added this to wsdl-xslt, and did some temporary
> test case tweaking to do a smoke test, but none of the test cases currently
> in the WSDL test suite test this functionality.  Would you be willing to
> write up some test cases to verify that my implementation is correct?
> 
> Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
>  
Received on Friday, 25 May 2007 13:53:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:58:46 UTC