W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-semann@w3.org > March 2007

Clarification on resolutions to CR issues 5 and 9

From: Joel Farrell <joelf@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:07:51 -0500
To: SAWSDL public list <public-ws-semann@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF562A2CCF.F97D079E-ON85257296.00611817-85257296.006398C0@us.ibm.com>

Hello,

I would like clarification on the resolution to issue 5 [1].  The
resolution was to remove the reference to the nonexistent WSDL attribute
component.  But we also said that the XML Schema components should be
mentioned.  So would this be acceptable?

In section 4.1.3 (element)

A non-empty modelReference on a top-level element declaration used in
WSDL is represented as {model reference} property of the XML Schema Element
Declaration component or the WSDL Element
Declaration component; the case of an empty modelReference or no
modelReference at all is represented with an Element Declaration
component that does not have a {model reference} property.

In section 4.1.4 (attribute)

A non-empty modelReference on a top-level attribute declaration used in
WSDL is represented as {model reference} property of the XML Schema
Attribute
Declaration component; the case of an empty modelReference or no
modelReference at all is represented with an Attribute Declaration
component that does not have a {model reference} property.

I would also like clarification on the issue  9 [2] on changing  the
namespace.

The new WSDL 2.0 namespace is http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl. We decided to use
the short method to be consistent with it. So, is the new sawsdl namespace
"http://www.w3.org/ns/sawsdl" or "http://www.w3.org/ns/sawsdl#"?

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/CR-20070126#x5
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/CR-20070126#x9

Thanks,
Joel
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2007 18:08:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:58:46 UTC