- From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 12:04:02 -0400
- To: public-ws-semann@w3.org
May I make a suggestion to everyone based on having chaired a WG in the past? It is important that the email from this group be archived and that both the folks here, and also outsiders, can find things via a combination of search and thread heading. For example, some point in the future someone will need to document the answer to some Last Call comment by pointing to some email message where the group argued some issue. A year or so from now it may be very hard to remember what "Action 07" or "issue 5" referred to. It also makes it hard for those who are trying to monitor the mail, but not reading every message to have a clue as to what the messages are about. A good WG practice is to use subjects that include some "semantic" content (at least in a human readable sense) and to do what I did in the subject line above when you rename an existing thread. Something like "issue 5 - annotation context" will make things much easier in the future Sorry to jump in, but for those of us in the 1,000 email a week range little things like this make a big difference -Jim H -- Professor James Hendler Director Joint Institute for Knowledge Discovery 301-405-2696 UMIACS, Univ of Maryland 301-314-9734 (Fax) College Park, MD 20742 http://www.cs.umd.edu/~hendler Web Log: http://www.mindswap.org/blog/author/hendler
Received on Tuesday, 30 May 2006 16:04:07 UTC