- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 17:32:05 +0200
- To: Laurent Henocque <laurent.henocque@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-ws-semann@w3.org
Laurent, this is now logged as issue 11 at [1]. 8-) Jacek [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x11 On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 19:13 +0200, Laurent Henocque wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > section 2 > > The document currently distinguishes among "simple type" data and "complex type" data, argueing that only in the former > case can the annotation be mentioned aside of the data. > > I think that some complex types may prove sufficiently general to be used in varied semantical concepts. If you think of > a "Point" type for instance (having an "x" and a "y"), it may be a coordinate in a geographic information system, or > else the location of the upper right corner of a rectangle in a diagram, etc... > > So I think that in some cases, complex type data can be annotated from the outside, very mutch like simple type data. > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFEV5M3IF1tz5h+GDARAmfiAJwKTwAC3I32R0DvBInb7y0Dva6FGwCeOrHq > JpF3fNsMLCZfQh0gKtC6BZI= > =iItn > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
Received on Monday, 8 May 2006 15:32:31 UTC