- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 15:01:44 +0100
- To: Rama Akkiraju <akkiraju@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: Brahmananda Sapkota <brahmananda.sapkota@deri.org>, SAWSDL public list <public-ws-semann@w3.org>
Hi Rama, Brahmananda, I was revisiting the implementations of the issues, and I noticed that the current editor's draft of the usage guide doesn't use the prefixes xs: and xsd: correctly. Please check that xs: is used in RDF data and xsd: in XML data. Be careful about RDF/XML, if we have any of that, please. 8-) Best regards, Jacek On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 14:39 +0200, Jacek Kopecky wrote: > Hi Rama, Brahmananda, > I was writing an email to Jonathan to clarify the comment #4 below, > because we noted that in 2.1 we don't use the XML Schema namespace and > the RDF Schema namespace has a correct number of # signs in it. > > However, I didn't send the email because, I noticed that the document > defines the prefix xs to map to http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema# which > is correct when used in RDF data (e.g. listings 2.2-1, 2.2-2, 2.3-1) > but incorrect when used for XML Schema elements (e.g. listings 1.2-1, > 1.2-2, 3.1-1). > > I suggest that we drop the # sign from the binding of prefix xs in 1.1, > introduce a prefix xs2 or something like that with the # sign in it, and > we use xs for the XML version of schema and xs2 for the RDF references. > > Best regards, > Jacek > > On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 17:53 +0200, Jacek Kopecky wrote: > > 4) We noticed an error in the example in Section 2.1 of the Usage Guide; > > there is an extra # on the schema namespace. Perhaps the examples should be > > validated more carefully - namely by submitting them into the WSDL test > > suite ;-). Not only will that help find errors in the WSDLs, but it will > > also encourage WSDL 2.0 vendors to make sure the annotations are easy to get > > at in their tools.
Received on Monday, 4 December 2006 14:01:54 UTC