W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-semann@w3.org > December 2006

Re: [Fwd: WSDL WG Last Call comments on SAWSDL]

From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 15:01:44 +0100
To: Rama Akkiraju <akkiraju@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Brahmananda Sapkota <brahmananda.sapkota@deri.org>, SAWSDL public list <public-ws-semann@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1165240904.6766.163.camel@localhost>

Hi Rama, Brahmananda, I was revisiting the implementations of the
issues, and I noticed that the current editor's draft of the usage guide
doesn't use the prefixes xs: and xsd: correctly. Please check that xs:
is used in RDF data and xsd: in XML data. Be careful about RDF/XML, if
we have any of that, please. 8-)

Best regards,

On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 14:39 +0200, Jacek Kopecky wrote:
> Hi Rama, Brahmananda,
> I was writing an email to Jonathan to clarify the comment #4 below,
> because we noted that in 2.1 we don't use the XML Schema namespace and
> the RDF Schema namespace has a correct number of # signs in it.
> However, I didn't send the email because, I noticed that the document
> defines the prefix xs to map to http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema# which
> is correct when used in RDF data (e.g. listings 2.2-1, 2.2-2, 2.3-1) 
> but incorrect when used for XML Schema elements (e.g. listings 1.2-1,
> 1.2-2, 3.1-1).
> I suggest that we drop the # sign from the binding of prefix xs in 1.1,
> introduce a prefix xs2 or something like that with the # sign in it, and
> we use xs for the XML version of schema and xs2 for the RDF references.
> Best regards,
> Jacek
> On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 17:53 +0200, Jacek Kopecky wrote:
> > 4) We noticed an error in the example in Section 2.1 of the Usage Guide;
> > there is an extra # on the schema namespace.  Perhaps the examples should be
> > validated more carefully - namely by submitting them into the WSDL test
> > suite ;-).  Not only will that help find errors in the WSDLs, but it will
> > also encourage WSDL 2.0 vendors to make sure the annotations are easy to get
> > at in their tools.
Received on Monday, 4 December 2006 14:01:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:36:18 UTC