- From: Holger Lausen <holger.lausen@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:25:53 +0200
- To: SAWSDL WG <public-ws-semann@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2006 14:26:05 UTC
Hi, I have a question: We are about to extend WSDL with pointers to semantic annotation... Why do we make / did WSDL-S make the distinction between <modelReference> for operation and <category> for interface? Naively I would expect that both WSDL components would be annotated equally (i.e. with a pointer to a semantic model), however within the section 2.3 "Service Categorization" the term "semantic model" is not mentioned. Additionally I think section 2.3 should be named "interface categorization", since in fact a service can inherit from multiple interfaces. I would suggest to use for both WSDL components the same means of annotation (i.e. modelReference), alternatively we could think about a more complex pointer mechanism like it is done in service category, but then I would expect some justification in the document on why the structures are different. best Holger -- Holger Lausen Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI) http://www.deri.org/ Tel: +43 512 5076464 Email: holger.lausen@deri.org
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2006 14:26:05 UTC