- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 09:15:46 -0400
- To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF64C76FF7.AF2A0174-ON85257721.0048CA59-85257721.0048DD5C@us.ibm.com>
Resending - I didn't realize that this didn't make it out last night because the attachments were too big - I've included links instead. __________________ All, I've done the edits for 9671 but people should look over my edits to make sure I did it all correctly. In addition to the edits in Katy's proposal, the following additional things were changed: - Updated xsd - Updated wsdl - Added Content to DeleteMetadata request (more below) - Added the Fault boilerplate text to the new "Faults" section - Added the boilerplate text to the Notational Conventions section about "generate" - Added a ref to the WSA SOAP Binding spec - due to the new faults section - Added ... to GetMetadataResponse pseudo-schema I added "Content" to the DeleteMetadata request because it seemed like people might want to delete just one of the Content forms (ie just EPR ref) w/o having to also delete the inlined data itself. But we should discuss this tomorrow - along with any of the other edits that I made. I've included two word docs - one is a diff of the final mex spec against the mex spec prior to these edits, and one is a diff of the mex spec against Katy's proposal. This will allow people to see the edits from two different perspectives. FYI - some of the diffs in the *-katy-diff.doc are due to the other issues we resolved today not being part of Katy's version - so you can ignore those change bars. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/10/05/wsmex-9671-diff.doc http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/10/05/wsmex-9671-katy-diff.doc thanks -Doug ______________________________________________________ STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:16:30 UTC