RE: MOAP is checked

Yes, the one in the attachment that you sent in your email with subject:
MOAP is checked. Thanks, - Wu Chou.

________________________________

From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 12:00 PM
To: Chou, Wu (Wu)
Cc: Li, Li (Li); public-ws-resource-access@w3.org;
public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
Subject: RE: MOAP is checked



Wu, 
  when you refer to the "checked in new version", did you mean the stuff
in the attachment I sent or the version here:
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/edcopies/wseventing.html  ? 

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog. 



"Chou, Wu (Wu)" <wuchou@avaya.com> 
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org 

03/29/2010 10:52 AM 

To
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS 
cc
"Li, Li (Li)" <lli5@avaya.com>, <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org> 
Subject
RE: MOAP is checked

	




Doug, 
  
The checked in new version looks good. You made a good point, and I
agree that we should leave the stuff in parens as it is. 
  
Many thanks, 
  
- Wu Chou. 


________________________________

From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com] 
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 5:31 PM
To: Chou, Wu (Wu)
Cc: Li, Li (Li); public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Subject: RE: MOAP is checked


Wu, 
 some of the edits are fine but others change the meaning quite a bit.
In particular you changed: 

By doing so the endpoint is indicating that the corresponding
WS-Eventing operations are supported by that endpoint even though they
do not explicitly appear in its WSDL (ie. the WS-Eventing operations do
not appear in the WSDL that MAY be retrievable by using
WS-MetadataExchange GetWSDL to that endpoint). 
to: 
By doing so the endpoint is indicating that the corresponding
WS-Eventing operations are supported by that endpoint even though they
are implicit and do not explicitly appear in its WSDL (i.e. the
WS-Eventing operations that do not appear in the WSDL MAY be retrievable
by using WS-MetadataExchange GetWSDL to that endpoint). 

Its the stuff in parens that worries me.  The new wording could be taken
to imply that some WS-Eventing ops might appear in the WSDL while others
may not and that would be bad.   I think I'm ok with most of the other
edits, but I'd prefer to leave the stuff in parens as is.  I've attached
a new version with just the first assertion's edits - the other
assertions (in all specs) would follow the same pattern. 



thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog. 


"Chou, Wu (Wu)" <wuchou@avaya.com> 

03/16/2010 03:20 PM 



To
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS 
cc
<public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>, "Li, Li (Li)" <lli5@avaya.com> 
Subject
RE: MOAP is checked


	





Doug, 
 
Here is a change marked word file of Section 9, which incorporates some
of the discussions so far and changes at word level on how to state
these requirements. It is rough and attached here intended for in
formation and further discussion. 
 
Thanks, 
 
- Wu Chou.[attachment "WS-Eventing-Section 9_marked_wu.doc" deleted by
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM]