RE: MOAP is checked

Hi Doug,

 

WS-Eventing Section 9.1 paragraph 2 says:

This specification defines a policy assertion (wse:EventSource). The
wse:EventSource policy assertion applies to the endpoint policy subject.


This paragraph defines the scope of the attachment to be "endpoint
subject" and the following paragraph 3 only explains what "endpoint
subject" means. Hence paragraph 3 seems redundant.

 

Thanks,

Li  

________________________________

From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 11:15 AM
To: Li, Li (Li)
Cc: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org;
public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org; Chou, Wu (Wu)
Subject: Re: MOAP is checked

 


Hi Li, 
  for paragraph #5 I agree - seems redundant.  For paragraph #3 though,
I think we may need to keep that since the assertions we define can't go
on all WSDL attachment points, rather they can only be attached to
certain ones.  For example, I'm not sure what it would mean to attach
the wse:EventSource assertion to a message.  How about you open up a new
issue so we can discuss these? 

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog. 



"Li, Li (Li)" <lli5@avaya.com> 
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org 

03/16/2010 11:02 AM 

To

<public-ws-resource-access@w3.org> 

cc

"Chou, Wu (Wu)" <wuchou@avaya.com> 

Subject

Re: MOAP is checked

 

 

 




I've made all of the updates for MOAP.  Please look them over to make
sure 
I didn't miss anything.

thanks
-Doug

Doug:

I just have some editorial comments. 

1. WS-Eventing Section 9.1 paragraph 3 seems a paraphrase of WS-Policy
1.5 Attachment Sections 4.1.2 and 5.4.2. Paragraph 5 seems a paraphrase
of WS-Policy 1.5 Framework section 4.3.1. 

2. The same for WS-Eventing Section 9.2 paragraphs 3 and 5.

3. The same for other WS-RA specs, including WS-Enumeration.

I wonder if we should avoid repeating or paraphrasing other spec, as we
have deliberately removed a lot of WS-Addressing paraphrases from WS-RA.

Thanks.

Li