Re: issue 8304: proposal 1

Folks,

In section 3.2 it reads:

The consumer MUSTSHOULD NOT issue additional Pull request messages  
after a Pull response containing a wsen:EndOfSequence element has been  
returned. Similarly, upon receipt of a Pull response containing a  
wsen:EndOfSequence element, the consumer MUSTSHOULD NOT issue a  
Release operation to signal that the enumeration context is no longer  
needed.

This is a change that I think is significant. As a SHOULD I could  
ignore it, but as a MUST in make me think we should delete the whole  
paragraph. If the consumer wants to fire off a message to test the  
error processing of the service, why not? So I would propose we delete  
the paragraph.


Otherwise this is OK with me.



On 08 Feb 2010, at 00:16, Gilbert Pilz wrote:

> Change-tracked version of proposal to resolve RFC2119 issues in WS- 
> Enumeration.
>
> - gp
> <wsenum-8304.zip>

Take care:

     Dr. David Snelling < David . Snelling . UK . Fujitsu . com >
     Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe Limited
     Hayes Park Central
     Hayes End Road
     Hayes, Middlesex  UB4 8FE
     Reg. No. 4153469

     +44-7590-293439 (Mobile)






______________________________________________________________________
                                        
 Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe Limited
 Hayes Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8FE
 Registered No. 4153469
 
 This e-mail and any attachments are for the sole use of addressee(s) and
 may contain information which is privileged and confidential. Unauthorised
 use or copying for disclosure is strictly prohibited. The fact that this
 e-mail has been scanned by Trendmicro Interscan does not guarantee that 
 it has not been intercepted or amended nor that it is virus-free.