- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:02:46 -0400
- To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Cc: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org, public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFE174739D.BF698FD3-ON8525763B.005D2DA4-8525763B.005DA654@us.ibm.com>
was going to save this for the f2f but..... T.Create() and T.Delete() are used to create/delete entire resources - using it to do something else (like _not_ creating/deleting a resource) would violate the extensibility rules of Transfer where it talks about extensions spec not contradicting the base spec. The way to think about ws-frag is that it defines the "instructions" for how to get the Put done. Put is still updating the resource, its just instead of doing a blind XML copy-n-replace, we're passing in an instruction for how to do the update but the semantics/purpose of the operation is still the same. thanks -Doug ______________________________________________________ STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog. Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org> Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org 09/24/2009 12:50 PM To Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS cc public-ws-resource-access@w3.org Subject Re: WS-Fragment uploaded On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Doug Davis wrote: > All, > Ram and I have just checked in ws-frag [1] for the WG's consideration. > There are still a couple of minor things that need to be cleaned up - like > fixing up the xsd - there's a list of open questions at the bottom of the > doc. But we think this is a pretty good starting point. If the WG > approves of this direction then we're hoping that it will remove the need > for the RT spec. I have a question about the introduction of 'mode' in fragment PUT mode has three different values: http://www.w3.org/2009/02/ws-fra/Modes/Replace http://www.w3.org/2009/02/ws-fra/Modes/Insert and http://www.w3.org/2009/02/ws-fra/Modes/Remove Put+Remove sounds awfully like a Delete, and Put+Insert looks also awfully like a Create. (and Put+Replace looks like... a Put) So why adding another axis of extensibility to duplicate what's already there? > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/edcopies/wsfrag.html > > thanks > -Doug > ______________________________________________________ > STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group > (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com > The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog. -- Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras. ~~Yves
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2009 17:03:43 UTC