- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 09:19:45 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- cc: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Doug Davis wrote:
> Yves,
> For the one operation in each spec that has been deemed 'safe', I was
> thinking of just adding this text after the definition of the operation:
>
> This operation will not result in any side effect imputable to the
> requester. This means that in case of an underlying protocol error that
> might get unnoticed, resending the same request can be done automatically.
>
> Does this work for you?
Yes, with a minor modification, can we say "This operation is safe; It
will not result in..." ?
(ie: I'd like to keep the 'safe' in the text somewhere)
--
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
~~Yves
Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2009 13:19:57 UTC