- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 19:00:20 -0500
- To: Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF86ED6288.01CDD1BA-ON85257687.0083B52F-85257688.00000AA6@us.ibm.com>
The 2nd sentence was added to try to address Wu's concerns that he mentioned during the call yesterday. What if we soften it a bit by removing the normative words: Note: as an optimization, a subscriber might want to consider using the same WS-MakeConnection Anonymous URI in both the NotifyTo and EndTo EPRs to allow the same MakeConnection message to be used to transmit either notifications or a SubscriptionEnd message. thanks -Doug ______________________________________________________ STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog. Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com> 12/09/2009 06:36 PM To Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org> cc Subject RE: Issue 8164: proposal Ø A subscription manager MAY choose to support mechanisms, such as the [WS-MakeConnection] specification, to enable delivery of notifications and the SubscriptionEnd message to non-addressable endpoints. This looks good. Ø Note: as an optimization, a subscriber SHOULD consider using the same WS-MakeConnection Anonymous URI in both the NotifyTo and EndTo EPRs to allow the same MakeConnection message to be used to transmit either notifications or a SubscriptionEnd message. Since there are valid situations that may require using different WS-MakeConnection Anonymous URIs in the NotifyTo and EndTo EPRs, the specification need not restrict the usage. Hence, I suggest deleting this sentence. Thanks. From: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Doug Davis Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 10:08 PM To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org Subject: Issue 8164: proposal (resending w/o extra stuff) Proposal: change: A subscription manager MAY choose to support mechanisms, such as the [WS-MakeConnection] specification, to enable delivery of notifications to non-addressable endpoints. to: A subscription manager MAY choose to support mechanisms, such as the [WS-MakeConnection] specification, to enable delivery of notifications and the SubscriptionEnd message to non-addressable endpoints. Note: as an optimization, a subscriber SHOULD consider using the same WS-MakeConnection Anonymous URI in both the NotifyTo and EndTo EPRs to allow the same MakeConnection message to be used to transmit either notifications or a SubscriptionEnd message. thanks -Doug ______________________________________________________ STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.
Received on Thursday, 10 December 2009 00:01:33 UTC