Issue 8284 - clarification from gil...

Gil,
  we discussed 8284 [1] during today's call.  In looking at BP's version 
of WSDL there appears to be two aspect of that version that are at play. 
First are the fixes that BP made to WSDL - these appear to be the things 
of interest in your issue - and those are probably good fixes.  However, 
the second aspect of BP's WSDL is its profiling of it.  In particular, BP 
adds restrictions like forcing it to use just HTTP.  These would seem a 
bit too restrictive for the WSRA specs.  Given these restrictions it 
wasn't clear how WSRA could pick up BP's version of WSDL.  Any thoughts on 
this?

[1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8284

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.